If the IRS wants to spot large numbers of people who are stiffing the tax collectors, it might want to consider auditing a fast-growing segment of the mortgage market.New research suggests that more than 1 out of 6 borrowers who take out limited-documentation or no-documentation mortgages do so in part because they have significant under-the-table income that they do not report on federal tax filings.

Limited documentation and no-documentation mortgages once were used primarily by self-employed professionals, small-business owners and individuals who are heavily dependent on periodic bonuses or commissions. In limited or no-documentation programs, applicants typically state their income and assets to the loan officer but are not required to show detailed proof of that information for the lender’s files.

Generally applicants are required to have good credit histories, but at the extreme — known as NINAs (no income verification, no asset verification) — they needn’t document much of anything to qualify. The attraction of such mortgages for lenders or brokers: They come with higher rates and compensation for the loan originator.

Low-doc mortgages were only a small fraction of the market in the 1990s, but today they are big business. This year they represent more than 16 percent of all new home loans, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication based in Bethesda, Md. Wall Street rating agency Standard & Poor’s says volume jumped by 50 percent between mid-2005 and mid-2006, based on mortgage securities pools it analyzed and rated.

Unlike earlier periods, however, today’s low-doc borrowers are much more likely to be people who could — but choose not to — document their income with W-2 forms or pay stubs.

According to a comprehensive survey sponsored by Inside Mortgage Finance and conducted by Campbell Communications, 39 percent of all low-doc borrowers this year are salaried wage-earners, the same percentage as self-employed borrowers.

Why do they prefer to go the low-doc route? Survey designer Geosegment Systems of Nashua, N.H., asked a representative national sample of 2,140 mortgage brokers active in the limited documentation field this question and came up with some eye-opening answers.

While 63 percent of brokers said they knew their self-employed clients had unreported income that they wanted to keep off the record, 71 percent said their borrowers’ applications were dependent on additional income “from a household member with poor credit.”

For example, say a married couple earns $10,000 a month, but one spouse had filed for bankruptcy or lost a house in a previous marriage. Most lenders would want to know about that in order to underwrite the new mortgage and charge an interest rate high enough to cover the added risk. But with a low or no-doc loan application, only the spouse with good credit would count as the borrower of record.

Twenty-two percent said low-doc clients had “divorce or other legal circumstances” that complicated their financial profiles. One of every 7 said the immigration status of their borrowers was an important issue, while 1 out of 12 said they knew that their low-doc stated-income borrowers actually were unemployed.

Unemployed? To Tom Popik, principal of Geosegment Systems and author of the study, responses like these suggest “there are significant risk factors” for lenders — and even for borrowers — in low-doc and no-doc home loan programs.

Mortgage companies who make or invest in low-doc mortgages largely agree, but they feel that the risks are controlled by the higher rates and fees they charge. After all, if a loan officer knows that the applicants have adequate income and assets to handle a mortgage, that’s what’s really important — not the fact that the standard documentation isn’t in the file.

When low-doc loans are “carefully underwritten,” said Ralph Edwards, head of the division specializing in such loans for mortgage banker Cunningham & Co. of Greensboro, N.C., “they are legitimate solutions to certain borrowers’ situations.”

But what about stiffing Uncle Sam? Edwards said he doesn’t approve of people illegally hiding income, but that the loan officer’s or lender’s main job is to make certain the mortgage is properly underwritten.

Brokers and lenders “are not paid to do the work of the IRS,” he said.

Source:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/11/26/REGRIMIA9G1.DTL